cadency mark造句

• Both the Iktinos and Anthemios chapters are considered the founding chapters, and as such, share the same cadency mark.
• In English heraldry, they are used in many different ways, and can be the cadency mark of the sixth son.
• At times arms with a cadency mark may be used on a hereditary basis : for instance, the arms of the 6th Duke.
• Nor have cadency marks usually been insisted upon by the College of Arms ( the heraldic authority for England, Wales and formerly Ireland ).
• These cadency marks are usually shown smaller than normal charges, but it still does not follow that a shield containing such a charge belongs to a cadet branch.
• Cadency marks may be used to identify the arms of brothers, in a system said to have been invented by John Writhe, Garter, in about 1500.
• Under Scottish law, an individual's heir succeeds to his arms undifferenced, while other descendants may succeed to arms differenced by special marks, called cadency marks.
• In correspondence published in the Heraldry Society's newsletter, Garter King of Arms Peter Gwynn-Jones firmly rejected a suggestion that cadency marks should be strictly enforced.
• However, in practice cadency marks are not much used in England and, even when they are, it is rare to see more than one or, at most, two of them on a coat of arms.
• Although textbooks on heraldry ( and articles like this one ) always agree on the English system of cadency set out above, most heraldic examples ( whether on old bookplates, church monuments, silver and the like ) ignore cadency marks altogether.
• The use of cadency marks to difference arms within the same family and the use of semy fields are distinctive features of Gallo-British heraldry ( in Scotland the most significant mark of cadency being the bordure, the small brisures playing a very minor role ).
• A later shield variation of the De Vere white molet has a smaller blue molet located within the white one but this may be a simple cadency mark-in heraldry the molet is also used in any family to indicate the third son of a title holder.
• Though " de facto " in English heraldry the crest is uncharged ( although it is supposed to be in theory ), as it would accumulate more and more cadency marks with each generation, the marks eventually becoming indistinguishable, the crests of the royal family are always shown as charged.
• As in other heraldic systems, these cadency marks are not always used; in any case, when the heir succeeds ( in Canada, the first child, whether male or female, according to strict primogeniture ), the mark of cadency is removed and the heir uses the plain coat of arms.
• Other grandchildren combine the brisure of their father with the relevant brisure of their own, which would in a short number of generations lead to confusion ( because it allows an uncle and nephew to have the same cadency mark ) and complexity ( because of an accumulation of cadency marks to show, for example, the fifth son of a third son of a second son ).
• Other grandchildren combine the brisure of their father with the relevant brisure of their own, which would in a short number of generations lead to confusion ( because it allows an uncle and nephew to have the same cadency mark ) and complexity ( because of an accumulation of cadency marks to show, for example, the fifth son of a third son of a second son ).
• As in other heraldic systems, these cadency marks are not always used; in any case, when the heir succeeds ( in Canada, this is normally the first child, whether male or female, according to strict primogeniture; however, the grantee may choose another person as heir ), the mark of cadency is removed and the heir uses the plain coat of arms.
• I can't remember off-hand whether Peter and Zara's father was an armiger; if so, they would both carry his arms impaled or quartered with those of the Princess Royal, differenced either with normal cadency marks ( A label and a crescent respectively, I think ), or with'tagged'labels as above . talk ) 10 : 42, 14 April 2009 ( UT